UseCase

Regulatory Reporting Automation

PiTech automates the full loan origination lifecycle from application intake through closing and servicing handoff reducing consumer origination cycle time from weeks to days, enforcing compliance controls at every workflow step automatically, and delivering the audit trail that fair lending examinations demand.

Weeks → Days

Submission preparation cycle

Full Lineage

Source to submitted value

Zero Errors

Pre-submission validation

2 hours

Ad hoc regulatory response

Client Snapshot

Industry

Capital Markets

Solution

Data Solutions | Process Solutions

Complexity

High

Delivery

Architecture + Implementation

The Problem

Capital markets regulatory reporting  FRTB market risk sensitivities, EMIR trade reporting, MiFID II transaction reporting, and SEC/FINRA submissions   is assembled at most mid-tier firms through spreadsheet pipelines, manual SQL extracts, and undocumented calculation logic held by a small team. When a key person leaves or a regulator requests a revised data cut on 48-hour notice, the institutional fragility of this architecture becomes immediately apparent.

Documentation debt compounds with every regulatory specification change. When the OCC updates a DFAST scenario or ESMA releases a revised EMIR field requirement, the change typically triggers ad hoc spreadsheet revision rather than a managed update to a documented, tested calculation pipeline. Each update cycle introduces new calculation variance risk that is invisible until a submission error surfaces under examiner scrutiny.

Ready to Start?

Schedule a Regulatory Reporting Assessment

Get a candid analysis of your current reporting pipeline fragility, lineage gaps, and modernization roadmap.

48 hours

typical regulator deadline for ad hoc capital markets data requests. Automated regulatory data infrastructure turns this into a 2-hour response. Manual pipelines turn it into an all-hands crisis that consumes staff capacity, produces inconsistent outputs, and signals data governance weakness to examiners.

How PiTech Delivers

01

Report-Back Architecture Design

Design begins with the report  its specific data requirements, source-to-submission lineage, calculation logic, and validation rules  then works backward to the data infrastructure required to produce it reliably. Every pipeline is built to satisfy the submission specification, not the other way around.

02

Version-Controlled Calculation Engine Implementation

FRTB sensitivities, CECL reserves, EMIR trade data fields, and MiFID II transaction report attributes implemented in documented, version-controlled code with defined test cases. Regulatory specification changes trigger a managed update cycle  not ad hoc spreadsheet revision with undocumented changes.

03

Pre-Submission Validation Framework

Automated data quality, completeness, and calculation accuracy checks run before every submission cycle. Examiners never see calculation errors or data gaps that the institution’s own systems could have caught  because the validation layer catches them first.

04

Audit Trail and Lineage Documentation

Every submitted value traceable to its source system record through every transformation step  with timestamps, transformation rule documentation, and reviewer approval records. Ad hoc regulator requests for data lineage are satisfied in minutes from the lineage system rather than hours of manual reconstruction.

Proven Outcomes

Weeks → Days

Submission preparation cycle time reduction in deployed programs

2 hours

Typical ad hoc regulatory data request response time vs. days manually

25–40%

Program timeline compression through automated conflict resolution methodology

Proven Outcomes

18+

Years in Regulated Industries

What You Gain

Weeks → Days

Regulatory submission preparation cycle time

Full lineage

Source-to-submission traceability for all submitted values

Automated

Pre-submission validation catching errors before filing

2 hours

Ad hoc regulatory data request response vs. all-hands crisis

What's Included

Regulatory data mart

Regulatory data mart

Source-to-submission lineage for FRTB, EMIR, MiFID II, DFAST, and SEC/FINRA reports as applicable

Version-controlled calculation engine

Version-controlled calculation engine

FRTB sensitivities, CECL, and regulatory metric calculations in documented code with test case suites

Regulatory change management process

Regulatory change management process

Specification change → impact assessment → pipeline update → testing → certification workflow

Pre-submission validation framework

Pre-submission validation framework

Automated completeness, accuracy, and regulatory edit checks before every filing cycle

Submission workflow automation

Submission workflow automation

Data assembly → calculation → validation → reviewer approval → filing preparation pipeline

Full audit trail system

Fair lending monitoring module

Full audit trail system

Source record through transformation to submitted value with timestamps and approval records

Performance dashboard

Performance dashboard

Submission cycle time, quality exception rate, deadline compliance, and regulatory calendar tracking

Frequently Asked Questions

Which capital markets regulations does PiTech have the deepest implementation experience with?

PiTech has implementation experience with FRTB Standardised Approach sensitivities calculations, EMIR trade reporting data pipelines, MiFID II transaction reporting fields, DFAST stress testing data, CECL reserve calculations, and SEC/FINRA regulatory reporting data engineering. Multi-regulation programs that address overlapping data dependencies deliver the highest value.

PiTech implements FRTB SA sensitivities calculations in version-controlled, documented code with defined test cases, delta/vega/curvature sensitivity specifications, and a change management process for regulatory specification updates. This replaces spreadsheet-based approaches with auditable, repeatable pipelines that can be independently validated by risk teams and examiners.

PiTech’s regulatory change management process monitors official publications for specification changes, conducts an impact assessment against deployed pipelines, implements and tests the updated calculations, and certifies the change before the first affected submission cycle. The process is documented and produces evidence of testing suitable for examiner review.

Yes. PiTech designs the regulatory data mart to serve both periodic submission workflows and intraday risk analytics. The same data infrastructure that produces FRTB submissions can drive intraday VaR and sensitivity calculations  the two use cases share underlying data infrastructure with different access patterns and calculation cadences.

A focused engagement covering two to three regulatory reports (e.g., FRTB and MiFID II transaction reporting) typically runs 9–14 months from discovery to production. Multi-regulation programs addressing overlapping data dependencies run 14–20 months. PiTech stages delivery to produce measurable cycle time improvement in the first 90 days through quick wins in pre-submission validation and data lineage documentation.

Regulatory reporting infrastructure is a compounding investment that pays returns on every submission cycle for years.

PiTech builds it right the first time  with the lineage, validation, and change management processes that regulated capital markets programs require.

Related Use Cases

Reach Our Customer Service Team

Contact Us